<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogRush &#8211; The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Poorer!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/</link>
	<description>Latest trends on the Internet - Blogging, Social Media...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:32:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhine Stone</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhine Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>I think you are right Fred. I am a small blogger myself. I implemented their codes on my blog, but never got any traffic from it and one day got a mail from them saying that my account is currently inactive. Well, I couldn&#039;t care less! I promptly removed their codes.
Best Regards and Thumbs up to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right Fred. I am a small blogger myself. I implemented their codes on my blog, but never got any traffic from it and one day got a mail from them saying that my account is currently inactive. Well, I couldn&#8217;t care less! I promptly removed their codes.<br />
Best Regards and Thumbs up to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaun</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget John, darren, and shoemoney all require the &quot;little guys&quot; or that 99% of people to keep the widget on their site so the big guys can continue to get traffic. With out the &quot;ppor&quot; there is no rich :) Therefor blog rush will fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget John, darren, and shoemoney all require the &#8220;little guys&#8221; or that 99% of people to keep the widget on their site so the big guys can continue to get traffic. With out the &#8220;ppor&#8221; there is no rich <img src='http://newestonthenet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Therefor blog rush will fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>I have not had a lot of luck with Digg, but I get a lot with StumbleUpon.  StumbleUpon is great for getting your articles in front of a lot of eyes very quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not had a lot of luck with Digg, but I get a lot with StumbleUpon.  StumbleUpon is great for getting your articles in front of a lot of eyes very quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Great reading here.  I think the best way to get traffic is through digg and stumble upon.  These have worked best for me.  I have noticed a drop in all traffic over the last couple of weeks though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reading here.  I think the best way to get traffic is through digg and stumble upon.  These have worked best for me.  I have noticed a drop in all traffic over the last couple of weeks though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Liam,

I absolutely agree Liam that if you bring more people to Blogrush that you deserve more traffic.  However, does it have to be exponentially more traffic?  I mean, if a blog has 10,000 page views in a day, why not allow the blog 10,000 blogrush page views?  Instead, Blogrush gives them 10,000 plus the page views of all of the blog&#039;s affiliates.  

Please don&#039;t get me wrong, I am not after traffic that I don&#039;t deserve.  However, if I have 1,000 page views a day, it would be nice to to get shoI wn on blogrush 1,000 times a day.  But the current structure will give me less.  

However, I don&#039;t have to worry about it anymore because I have uninstalled Blogrush.  I think that everyone who is pushing it should be ashamed.  Where is the value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liam,</p>
<p>I absolutely agree Liam that if you bring more people to Blogrush that you deserve more traffic.  However, does it have to be exponentially more traffic?  I mean, if a blog has 10,000 page views in a day, why not allow the blog 10,000 blogrush page views?  Instead, Blogrush gives them 10,000 plus the page views of all of the blog&#8217;s affiliates.  </p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am not after traffic that I don&#8217;t deserve.  However, if I have 1,000 page views a day, it would be nice to to get shoI wn on blogrush 1,000 times a day.  But the current structure will give me less.  </p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t have to worry about it anymore because I have uninstalled Blogrush.  I think that everyone who is pushing it should be ashamed.  Where is the value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Closs</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Closs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Your post, chimes in as if you expected to get free-traffic from appearing on these larger bloggers pages. 

If you bring more people to BlogRush and help BlogRush grow surely you deserve more traffic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post, chimes in as if you expected to get free-traffic from appearing on these larger bloggers pages. </p>
<p>If you bring more people to BlogRush and help BlogRush grow surely you deserve more traffic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Low Click-throughs Hurt BlogRush &#124; Blogging Profits</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Low Click-throughs Hurt BlogRush &#124; Blogging Profits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] BlogRush - The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Poorer!!! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlogRush &#8211; The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Poorer!!! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chillin&#8217; Alone at Home with BlogRush and a Cigar &#124; Aiming for Independence</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Chillin&#8217; Alone at Home with BlogRush and a Cigar &#124; Aiming for Independence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] an A-List blogger rather than going straight to the site to sign up, as my friend Fred suggests at Newest On The Net. Just like making a purchase via an affiliate link, you pay the same price, and receive the same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an A-List blogger rather than going straight to the site to sign up, as my friend Fred suggests at Newest On The Net. Just like making a purchase via an affiliate link, you pay the same price, and receive the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Jennifer,

I agree with you that there is nothing wrong with the concept behind Blogrush.  I actually think that it is pretty neat.  What I don&#039;t like is the tiered affiliate system that they are using to drive impressions.  

Have you checked out the Blogrush stats page to see if the increase in traffic is coming from Blogrush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer,</p>
<p>I agree with you that there is nothing wrong with the concept behind Blogrush.  I actually think that it is pretty neat.  What I don&#8217;t like is the tiered affiliate system that they are using to drive impressions.  </p>
<p>Have you checked out the Blogrush stats page to see if the increase in traffic is coming from Blogrush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer</title>
		<link>http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newestonthenet.com/blogrush-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-poorer/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I am not sure if it is because of blogrush or what is going on ,but I have had a huge increase in traffic the last several days and a huge increase in my Google Adsense income. Both have doubled on the day stats!!!!

If it because of Blog rush than more power to it. and since it is free I do not see why bloggers are talking about it an worried if it increases traffic or not. Even if you get just a few more clicks - every little bit helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if it is because of blogrush or what is going on ,but I have had a huge increase in traffic the last several days and a huge increase in my Google Adsense income. Both have doubled on the day stats!!!!</p>
<p>If it because of Blog rush than more power to it. and since it is free I do not see why bloggers are talking about it an worried if it increases traffic or not. Even if you get just a few more clicks &#8211; every little bit helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
